- #Darktable import from virtual drive update
- #Darktable import from virtual drive upgrade
- #Darktable import from virtual drive full
That way I will not have to worry about the size limitations of my laptop drive (which is only 500GB).Īs a general question for those using LR4 in place of ASP - do you use multiple catalogs? Or a single catalog? Multiple catalogs have always seemed like a pain to me and a LR book I read suggested only using a single catalog and importing everything into it.Premagic gives your business the professional look you desire.
#Darktable import from virtual drive upgrade
I have seen a lot of comments in this thread about problems using Lightroom on networks but I work only on a single (laptop) system and am going to change my work flow to put my raw images and LR catalog on a large (1TB+) external usb 3.0 drive as soon as my LR4 upgrade arrives from the vendor. It is too bad about ASP as it seemed as though it had the potential to be a great piece of software when it was released. One of those two will probably become my general "go to" software. And my LR4 trial did a very good job taking care of lens distortion as well as supplying the functionality that PhotoNinja is missing (heal and clone functionality, masking, spot removal, graduated filter and better vignetting). I have found that PhotoNinja's highlight protection, color enhancement, noise reduction and details adjustments are very, very good. I have mostly stopped using it and switched to Lightroom and PictureCode's new PhotoNinja.
#Darktable import from virtual drive update
I personally have become quite discouraged about ASP considering that there has not been an update in a very long time and Corel does not respond to my bug reports. I have Lightroom on one Windows computer, but I use ASP on Ubuntu and the pickings are limited on Linux.
#Darktable import from virtual drive full
* ASP still works fine for my current camera and will continue to do so for my current equipment but I can see next year getting a Canon 5DMk3 or a cheaper full frame. Pgman wrote:I'm making a completely unscientific mini-poll of what are people thinking, trying, moving to after the demise of ASP (if it will happen). Here's a sample shot I made showing off the difference between C1 and ASP: But for what I'm doing C1 gives the better result, it's not even a close race. As I mentioned, C1 is unbelievably slow compared to ASP. I used it in ASP often, especially to shake silhouette photos into shape. The bleach bypass style in C1 is far too subtle in comparison, and so I never use it. What I do miss is the extreme bleach bypass from ASP. TBQH I never really found this to be more than a gimmick in ASP, but the capability exists in C1. It does have user export/importable styles, and I downloaded a few dozen including a bunch of generic film simulations. I never used C1 v6, but v7 has all the things you describe: vignette control, layers, and brushes. This doesn't seem to be the case any longer. It is very good at that, but it's not something that fits my workflow. I found that C1 is more of a classic RAW converter, like RAW Therapee and Canon DPP. For me it's functionality like adding vignette, adjustment layers/brushes, b&W film simulation etc. It's the nice little bit's that make you use Lightroom/ASP instead of ACR+Photoshop. Binoyte wrote:Can you tell us more about this missing features ?